Current:Home > ScamsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -InvestTomorrow
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-26 13:53:51
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (52788)
Related
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Jon Hamm spills on new Fox show 'Grimsburg,' reuniting with 'Mad Men' costar
- Eyes on the road: Automated speed cameras get a fresh look as traffic deaths mount
- Endangered right whale floating dead off Georgia is rare species’ second fatality since January
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Driver who injured 9 in a California sidewalk crash guilty of hit-and-run but not DUI
- Verdict in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial expected Friday, capping busy week of court action
- Pennsylvania courts say it didn’t pay ransom in cyberattack, and attackers never sent a demand
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Power Rangers’ Jason Faunt Reveals Surprising Meaning Behind Baby Girl’s Name
Ranking
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Will it take a high-profile athlete being shot and killed to make us care? | Opinion
- Here’s where all the cases against Trump stand as he campaigns for a return to the White House
- Mother, daughter killed by car that ran red light after attending Drake concert: Reports
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Does 'Feud: Capote Vs. The Swans' ruffle enough feathers
- Chiefs lineman Trey Smith shares WWE title belt with frightened boy after parade shooting
- Outer Banks Star Austin North Speaks Out After Arrest Over Alleged Hospital Attack
Recommendation
Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
Met Gala 2024 dress code, co-chairs revealed: Bad Bunny, JLo, Zendaya set to host
Trump's first criminal trial set to begin March 25 as judge denies bid to dismiss hush money case
Georgia Senate passes plan meant to slow increases in property tax bills
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Ohio woman who disappeared with 5-year-old foster son she may have harmed now faces charges
Woman killed at Chiefs' Super Bowl celebration identified as radio DJ Lisa Lopez-Galvan
Will it take a high-profile athlete being shot and killed to make us care? | Opinion